Early Market Engagement, Is it the right approach for India?

[admin]

Upvote

Up

0

::

One of the major problems for public procurers in India is to attract qualified contractors, particularly for large infrastructure projects. Because of this (among other reasons), many projects are highly delayed adversely impacting delivery of public services. Many countries across the World have adopted early market engagement (EME) for expanding the Supplier market. Is it the right approach for India?

[Bhajaman Sabut]

Upvote

Up

0

::

Yes, Early Market Engagement is definitely the right approach in the current, evolving public procurement ecosystem. However, it is suggested not be applied universally due to its various challenges such as implementation difficulties, ensuring transparency and the potential misuse of the innovative approach. It should be introduced in a phased manner, allowing the systems and stakeholders to gradually adopt its principles and ethics. It is especially suitable for critical and innovation-driven sectors like Health, Defense, Information Technology etc., where it can add significant value in the present public procurement systems in India. Ultimately, Early Market Engagement supports a shift toward value-based, outcome-oriented procurement moving beyond the traditional focus on the lowest-price bids.

[Rajneesh Jindal]

Upvote

Up

0

::

EME if done prior to start of a bidding process, would help to prepare the bidding documents which shall take into consideration the real market scenario w.r.t the competency and availability of the contractors/suppliers to ensure that the works are completed within the stipulated time and with the required specifications. This would also reduce the number and quantum of disputes during the execution of the contract, the most important being the prolongation claims usually submitted by the contractors, which in turn would also save time and/or money of both the contract parties in handling the disputes. Yes, the non-availability of the adequate number of the competent contractors/suppliers for large infrastructure projects is an issue in India, and by adopting EME this issue can be handled to a greater extent.

[Sohail Mazumdar]

Upvote

Up

0

::

The World Bank recently piloted an early market engagement session focused on upcoming pipeline transport projects in India, marking a promising step toward more inclusive and transparent procurement processes. The event brought together a wide spectrum of stakeholders, including government employers, prospective bidders, and sector experts, creating a vibrant platform to exchange ideas and expectations.

Participants were offered a preview of potential contract packages, proposed procurement modalities, and key innovations in evaluation criteria. A highlight of the session was the discussion on the rated criteria approach, which proposes assigning 50 percent weight to technical factors such as contractor expertise, sustainability measures, and the adoption of innovative technologies. While many bidders welcomed this shift toward quality-focused evaluation, several attendees also emphasized the need to include health and safety considerations as a core part of the scoring methodology.

This engagement provided valuable insights into stakeholder perspectives and laid the groundwork for refining future consultations. A few practical suggestions emerged:

– Hybrid formats should be considered to enable wider participation from contractors across different regions.

– Regional-level dialogues could play a key role in equipping newer and local contracting firms with the information they need to compete effectively.

As the World Bank continues to support India’s infrastructure growth, such early market engagement efforts are essential to build trust, improve readiness, and foster competition. These steps will help ensure better outcomes for all partners involved.

[Santhanam Krishnan]

Upvote

Up

0

::

EME appears to be a good idea.There is a reference to use of rated criteria by some one;In India I feel one has to proceed with caution where an element of subjectivity is introduced in bid evaluation.Even if not misused by the Purchaser,losing firms can create havoc with complaints. QCBS would be ideal for complicated contracts as in Nuclear Powr corporation etc. However it is not appropriate for routine works etc.

There is the issue of giving marks to engineers/Key staff . Commitments made in bids may not be followed in actual deployment etc.

Why the caution? Apart from the issues mentioned above, the role of AI which emerged later, changes the whole picture.
There is the possibility of AI overpowering/undermining the bid process by producing ideal english/data for bids (mostly not verifiable.).

[Author]

Posts