Pros and cons of Centralized Vendor Registry

[admin]

Upvote

Up

5

::

Would it be useful to create a Centralized Vendor Registry for Public Procurement in India with features like single window vendor registration for entire country (thus removing the need for registration with each state/entity), repository for verified experience and other qualification certificates, debarment/blacklisting status, supplier performance rating etc.?

[Virendra Singh]

Upvote

Up

2

::

Pros
Single Window Registration
Verified Certificate Repository
Debarment & Blacklisting Records
Supplier Performance Ratings
Unified Compliance Standards
Interoperable API Framework
Audit Trail & Accountability
Efficiency for MSMEs

Cons
Federal Autonomy
Legacy System Integration
Data Privacy & Security
Rating Disputes
Initial Transition Costs
Vendor Profiling Sensitivity

[AMIT KUMAR]

Upvote

Up

3

::

Centralized Vendor registration for public procurement will help in multiple ways. It will save time and cost of many organisations in shortlisting vendors to make a business deal. It can be single window registration within a state considering change of taxation/statuary compliances from state to state in India.

Through centralised or single window vendor registry, information security related risks can be minimised. Due diligence of new vendor is one of the important stages in supply chain management as it helps protect against risks associated with the vendors that have access to customers’ information that have been shared. Integrating privacy and data protection due diligence into the early stages of the centralised vendor registration process may help to minimise exposure legal, regulatory and reputational risks. Through centralised registration, customers can ensure compliance of their obligations by the vendors.

Vendor’s approach to processing personal information can be fixed in line with Privacy and data protection policy and other relevant commitments.

If personal information is going to be processed by a vendor, it can be asked during the centralised registration to make them understand privacy and data protection risks associated. Through centralised registration, Vendor may be evaluated based on their record of the handling personal information activities.

At centralised vendor registration, detail of past years litigation or prosecution, enforcement action will be verified. Vendor may be also asked about its compliance history with statutory obligations.

Centralised vendor registration will have limited validity period. If it is for long period, there may be risk that vendor will hide its latest performance, litigation or statuary compliance related issue and take advantage of centralised registration to keep continue their business. It may be required to validate their performance and compliances records after 1 or maximum 2 years.

[Santhanam Krishnan]

Upvote

Up

0

::

Good idea .However to be effective (and acceptable as many state level civil contractors have political links)this should be only for high value contract(or)s.
NHAI apparently has a good model.
However at the state level, it is a must.In addition especially at state level,whenever a bidder participates in a tender, his current and past committments should be made public to avoid false certfification.

[Santhanam Krishnan]

Upvote

Up

0

::

And also consult FICCI etc

[Author]

Posts